Reliability, Power, Functions, and Relations: A Reply to Humphreys

نویسندگان
چکیده

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Why are our similarities so different? A reply to Humphreys and Riddoch.

ed ‘perceptual’ level; using line drawings, greyscale or silhouettes. In conclusion, we suggest that retinotopic variables – such as EO – do have predictive validity for object naming tasks, both under normality and under pathology. Such measures may not generalise beyond the Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980) set of pictures, but we have never claimed otherwise (and the same is of course true for...

متن کامل

Designing a Framework to Explain the Professional Identity of Iranian Teachers Using a Power Relations Approach

Based on the grounds giving form to teachers' professional identity in Iran's educational system, the present study aims to provide a framework to portray, with a power-based approach, the various kinds of professional identity which can be perceived for Iranian teachers. For this purpose, narratives were collected and the discourses were analyzed, which led to different kinds of issues regard...

متن کامل

Global Health as a Field of Power Relations: A Response to Recent Commentaries

Actors working in global health often portray it as an enterprise grounded in principled concerns, advanced by individuals and organizations who draw on scientific evidence to pursue health equity. This portrait is incomplete. It is also a field of power relations—a social arena in which actors claim and draw on expertise and moral authority to gain influence and pursue career, organizational a...

متن کامل

Pyramid Power: A Reply to Commentaries.

Four thoughtful commentaries identify important issues and insights pertaining to the pyramid of needs presented by Kenrick, Griskevicius, Neuberg, and Schaller (2010, this issue). Here, we offer additional thoughts on some of these issues and insights, with an emphasis on the logical implications that result from an evolutionary analysis of fundamental human needs.

متن کامل

Inconceivable Support Relations: Reply to Stanford

Philosophers are drawn to the Atomic Theory like a dog to an old shoe, but my results about realism and anti-realism in Tracking Truth, and the distinctive position I carved out on their basis, are independent of the fate of my comments about that historical case. I will defend those comments against Stanford’s objections below, but first I will explain the argument he ignored, because its resu...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Applied Psychological Measurement

سال: 1993

ISSN: 0146-6216,1552-3497

DOI: 10.1177/014662169301700103